According to the link below: Facebook censors content. The question is whether Facebook wants to be part of the problem or part of the solution. In a real market economy, they would be considered a private entity and can censor what they choose. Of course, the line is blurred when you have corporatism, no?
You see, Facebook has a motivation to stay “sponsored” by the state. Don’t they? If they fall out of favor, they won’t get special protection. They need to stay “too big to fail.”
The follow-on question is whether the Facebook as an institution really thinks the State should have a monopoly on force. Are they really that good?